Legal Opinion

Hatch v. Szymanski

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 8, 2001No. 3-00-0832PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holdridge

Jesse Hatch was an inmate in the Stateville Correctional Center when he submitted a pro se petition asking the court to issue a writ of mandamus. In his petition, Hatch alleged that Zenon Szymanski, Stateville’s superintendent in charge of the prison’s industry program, had an official duty to consider Hatch for a job in either the prison’s garment shop or furniture shop. The State moved to dismiss the petition for failure to state a cause of action. 735 ILCS 5/2 — 615(a) (West 2000). The circuit court granted the motion. On appeal, Hatch argues that the court erred by granting the State’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of RossiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  2. Givot v. OrrAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  3. People Ex Rel. Collins v. YoungAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  4. Kaiser v. FlemingAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  5. Ikpoh v. ZollarAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Mason v. SnyderAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  2. Lucas v. TaylorAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  3. Caruth v. QuinleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  4. Dupree v. HardyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  5. Ford v. WalkerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API