Legal Opinion

Helm v. Washington

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 4, 1999No. 3-98-0759PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breslin

Plaintiff Donald Helm brought a mandamus action against defendant Odie Washington, Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections (DOC). Plaintiff claimed that he was entitled to 180 days of meritorious good-conduct credit, which defendant arbitrarily denied. On defendant’s motion, the trial court found the petition frivolous and dismissed it. In this appeal, plaintiff contends that (1) the trial court erred in denying mandamus relief; (2) the court erred in finding his petition frivolous; and (3) defendant denied him due process of law by failing to ensure that plaintiff had meaningful…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Burke v. 12 Rothschild's Liquor Mart, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Kunkel v. WaltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. AldridgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Orenic v. Illinois State Labor Relations BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Mason v. SnyderAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  2. Caruth v. QuinleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  3. People v. ShawAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  4. People v. CarterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  5. Guzzo v. SnyderAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API