Geib v. New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WEIS, Circuit Judge.
In response in part to financial constraints, the trustees of a multi-employer pension plan amended its reemployment provision and suspended payments to pensioners receiving benefits under a retirement program based on years of service. The plan did not specify a “normal retirement age,” and plaintiffs here are pensioners who had not reached age 65. In these circumstances, we find no error in the district court’s determinations that the trustees had neither violated ERISA nor acted arbitrarily and capriciously. We therefore will affirm the judgment for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Massachusetts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Rosen v. Hotel And Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Union Of Phila.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Ellis M. Hurn v. Retirement Fund Trust of the Plumbing, Heating and Piping Industry of SoutherncaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Samuel A. Haize, D/B/A "Marlene Store" v. Hanover Insurance Co. And Caribbean Atlantic InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Struble v. New Jersey Brewery Employees' Welfare Trust FundCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Baker v. Lukens Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Richard Geib v. New York State Teamsters Conference Pension And Retirement FundCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Tucker v. General Motors Retirement ProgramDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
- Haeffele v. Hercules Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1987
- Ryan v. Asbestos Workers Union Local 42 Pension FunCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.