Sell v. Price
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT OF MAGISTRATE IN ITS ENTIRETY
RICE, District Judge.
The captioned cause is before this Court upon motions to dismiss by Defendants Charles E. Price and the City of Troy, and by Defendant Kar Gard Muffler Centers of Ohio, Inc. (Kar Gard). Three grounds are alleged, to wit:
1. This Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the cause of action;
2. The complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and
3. The applicable statute of limitations has expired.
Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), (6). In addition, Defendants, Charles E. Price and the City of Troy,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Dennis v. SparksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- First Capital Asset Management, Inc. v. Brickellbush, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Walters v. Village of Oak LawnDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
- Lopez v. RuhlDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1984
- Stanley v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984
- Woods v. City of Dayton, OhioDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.