Legal Opinion
Woods v. City of Dayton, Ohio
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided February 4, 1983No. C-3-80-333PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING IN PART, AND NOT RULING UPON IN PART, DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; COUNSEL DIRECTED TO FILE FURTHER MEMORANDA UPON SPECIFIED POINT; TRIAL CONTINUED
RICE, District Judge.
Plaintiff filed suit in this Court on August 14, 1980, claiming that Defendants violated his constitutional rights as a result of an altercation with City of Dayton policemen on April 5, 1979. Presently pending before this Court is a motion by Defendants for summary judgment (Doc. # 26). For the reasons set forth below, said motion is sustained in part, and not ruled upon in part.…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. KnottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Laurel C. Thomas v. Walter Shipka, in His Capacity as Clerk of the Parma Municipal CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Payne v. A.O. Smith Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
- Weethee v. BosoOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
- Sylla v. Massey-Ferguson Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1984
- Dodrill v. Lorain County SheriffOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.