Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Brennan
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided June 1, 2017No. Civil Action No. 14-13380-PBSPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Saris, C.J.
Following a seven-day bench trial, the Court concluded that plaintiff Diping Anderson’s termination from her employment as a Postal Police Officer (“PPO”) was retaliatory in violation of Title VII. The Court issued its findings of fact and conclusions of law on March 16, 2017. Anderson v. Brennan, No. CV 14-13380-*255PBS, 2017 WL 1032502 (D. Mass. Mar. 16, 2017). The Court assumes familiarity with that decision. Judgment was entered on March 17, 2017. The parties subsequently filed four motions seeking reconsideration of both liability and remedies.
The Court’s…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Calero-Cerezo v. U.S. Dep of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Loeffler v. FrankSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Darrell D. Thurman v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Anderson v. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- Anderson v. BrennanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017