Legal Opinion

Swann v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 14, 1983No. 61809PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

435 So.2d 797 (1983)

W.A. SWANN, Jr., Etc., Petitioner,

v.

A.O. MITCHELL, et al., Respondents.

No. 61809.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 14, 1983.

W.A. Swann, Jr., in pro. per.

Robert D. Bell and Raymon J. Hahn of Fisher, Bell, Hahn, Winn & Schuster, Pensacola, for respondents.

ADKINS, Justice.

We review the opinion of the First District Court of Appeal in Swann v. Mitchell, 408 So.2d 681 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), which directly conflicts with Obel v. Henshaw, 130 So.2d 892 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961), and Wiese v. Wiese, 107 So.2d 208 (Fla. 2d DCA 1958), on the same point of law. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Stern v. SternSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  2. Agricultural Services Association, Incorporated v. Ferry-Morse Seed Company, Incorporated, and Waldo Rohnert Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  3. Buck v. MuellerOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. In Re Marriage of LukensCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  5. Rosenberg v. J. C. Penney Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. Disotell v. StiltnerAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Lutz v. SchmillenWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Nelson v. NelsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  5. Lutz v. SchmillenWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API