Legal Opinion

Lutz v. Schmillen

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1995No. 94-5PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellants Kennis Lutz, Marsha Lutz, Loren Lutz, Marion Lutz, and Elk Track, Inc. appeal from the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order for accounting and appointing master; from the district court’s judgment; and from the master’s final report which was adopted in the district court’s judgment.

We affirm.

Issues

Appellants present five issues for our review:

A. The trial court erred in finding that the Goosewing Ranch was an asset of the partnership.

B. In the alternative, assuming that the Goosewing Ranch is partnership property, the trial court erred in adopting the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Hopper v. All Pet Animal Clinic, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Hooper v. YoderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  4. Shumway v. ShumwayIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Weisbrod v. ElyWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. B & R BUILDERS v. BeilgardWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Lutz v. SchmillenWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Owens v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. James D. Leckrone v. James D. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
  5. Lutz v. SchmillenWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API