Legal Opinion

Canedo v. New Orleans & Carrollton Railroad

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 15, 1900No. 13,395PublishedCited by 4 opinions

^ PPEAL from the Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans — Bighlor,

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Blanchard, J.

Plaintiff, a young Spanish girl, seeks to hold defendant responsible in damages for injuries inflicted upon her by being struck by one of the street cars of the company.

*2150' Allegations of fault, negligence and recklessness of the company and its agents, usual in- damage suits, are made.

Her injuries are described, the pain and suffering she underwent delineated, the medical and surgical treatment she received outlined, and the length of time she was laid up given.

It is also averred that her injuries are serious and permanent, her general…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dieck v. New Orleans, City & Lake RailroadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1898
  2. O'Rourke v. New Orleans City & Lake RailroadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1899
  3. Farrar v. New Orleans & Carrollton RailroadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Crenshaw v. Asheville & Biltmore Street Railway & Transportation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. Crenshaw v. . Street R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. Favaza v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Taranto v. Orleans Kenner Traction Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API