State v. Shipps
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
NATURE OF CASE
Kelly R. Shipps appeals from his conviction for kidnapping.
SCOPE OF REVIEW
The decision whether to grant a motion for mistrial is within the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed on appeal in the absence of an abuse of discretion. State v. Haltom, 264 Neb. 976, 653 N.W.2d 232 (2002).
In a criminal case, a motion for new trial is addressed to the discretion of the trial court, and unless an abuse of discretion is shown, the trial court’s determination will not be disturbed. State v. Aguilar, 264 Neb. 899, 652 N.W.2d 894 (2002).
FACTS
Shipps pled not guilty to four…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- State v. BjorklundNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. JacksonNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- Trebelhorn v. BartlettNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. RobinsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. VanNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. FaustNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. McPhersonNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. FreemanNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.