Legal Opinion

Trebelhorn v. Bartlett

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1951No. 32903PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages,from defendants, who allegedly conspired together for the purpose of fraudulently inducing him, and by false and fraudulent representations of each did so induce him to sell his stock in defendant Ace Plumbing & Heating Company, a corporation, for less than its actual value..

Upon issues joined and trial to a jury, it returned a verdict for plaintiff in the amount of $4,000, and judgment was entered thereon. The trial court overruled defendants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative for a new trial, and they…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Zinn v. Ex-Cell-O Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Rettinger ex rel. Standard Oil Co. v. PierpontNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  3. McDonough v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  4. Pahl v. SpragueNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Helming v. KashakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Russo v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Upah v. Ancona Bros. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Wilson & Co. v. United Packinghouse Wkrs. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1960
  4. Wiekhorst Bros. Excavating & Equipment Co. v. LudewigNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Dixon v. Reconciliation, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API