Legal Opinion

Hugill v. Doty

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 6, 1949No. 33485PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLuttrell, J.

Plaintiff, Hugill, brought this action against defendant, Doty, for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff when struck by an automobile belonging to and driven by defendant. Defendant in his answer denied negligence, alleged contributory negligence, and further pleaded that the accident was unavoidable. The trial court submitted the case to the jury, which returned a verdict in favor of defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

On the appeal the sole question presented for determination is whether the trial court erred in giving the jury instruction No. 15.

The facts are undisputed. Plaintiff was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Harris v. Misssouri, K. & T. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Hines v. DeanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Mascho v. HinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Folsom Morris Coal Mining Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Wilson v. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Davis v. National Pioneer Insurance CompanyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
  2. Breno v. WeaverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. Disney v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  4. Lucy v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  5. Squyres v. KlickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API