State, Department of Motor Vehicles & Public Safety v. Lovett
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The State of Nevada, Department of Motor Vehicles and Public Safety (“DMV”), asks this court to hold that federal park rangers are police officers within the meaning of the Nevada implied consent laws, and that they are therefore authorized to serve as agents of the DMV in revoking the driving privileges of Nevada *475motorists. We hold that the broad language of the relevant statutes supports this construction. In addition, we find no persuasive reason to hold that applicable federal regulations were intended to thwart a state’s interest in revoking the state driver’s license of a…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Walter T. BestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- American International Vacations v. MacBrideNevada Supreme Court · 1983
- United States v. Robert James SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- State, Department of Motor Vehicles v. VezerisNevada Supreme Court · 1986
- United States v. James M. RoweCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by29 opinions
- Gallagher v. City of Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- Executive Management, Ltd. v. Ticor Title InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 2002
- County of Clark Ex Rel. University Medical Center v. UpchurchNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- Cromer v. WilsonNevada Supreme Court · 2010
- Orion Portfolio Services 2, LLC v. County of Clark Ex Rel. University Medical CenterNevada Supreme Court · 2010
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.