Legal Opinion

State v. Lowry

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 3, 1950PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

There are no exceptive assignments of error appearing on the record which call for elaboration or any special discussion. Indeed, the cases seem to have been tried with care and circumspection. The evidence of a similar assault against another on the part of Woodrow Lowry about two months prior to the occurrence under investigation was competent to show quo animo, intent or design on his part, and the jury was so instructed by the trial court. S. v. Biggs, 224 N.C. 722, 32 S.E. 2d 352; S. v. Edwards, 224 N.C. 527, 31 S.E. 2d 516; S. v. Harris, 223 N.C. 697, 28 S.E. 2d 232; S. v. Batson, 220…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. State v. . PayneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. State v. . SmoakSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. State v. . BiggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. State v. . BatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. MusselwhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API