Legal Opinion

State v. McClain

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 28, 1954PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEeviN, J.

Tbe defendant emphasizes tbe assignment of error based on tbe admission of tbe testimony indicating tbat she committed another distinct crime, to wit, larceny, several hours after her last assignation with tbe State’s witness Bolling.

Tbe general rule is tbat in a prosecution for a particular crime, the State cannot offer evidence tending to show tbat tbe accused has committed another distinct, independent, or separate offense. S. v. Fowler, 230 N.C. 470, 53 S.E. 2d 853; S. v. Choate, 228 N.C. 491, 46 S.E. 2d 476; S. v. Godwin, 224 N.C. 846, 32 S.E. 2d 609; S. v. Wilson, 217 N.C. 123, 7 S.E.…

2Cases cited89 opinions

  1. People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. State v. LyleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  3. Shaffner v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
  4. State v. . VinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1869
  5. State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. . GailorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  3. State v. . GoochSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API