Legal Opinion

Morris v. Clawson Tank Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1998No. 108659, Calendar No. 18PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrickley, J.

We are called upon to determine the scope of the plaintiffs duty to mitigate damages in the context of a discriminatory discharge suit under the Handicappers’ Civil Rights Act. MCL 37.1101 et seq.\ MSA 3.550(101) et seq.

i

The plaintiff was employed as a general laborer by the defendant, a manufacturer of underground storage and waste tanks. The plaintiff lost an eye on August 13, 1989, in an incident not related to his work at Clawson Tank. He reported back to Clawson Tank one month later with a note from his physician stating that he was able to return to work. At this point, however, he was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Rasheed v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Paschke v. Retool IndustriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Mudge v. MacOmb CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Shiffer v. Board of Education of Gibraltar School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Junerous Cook v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  2. Landin v. Healthsource Saginaw, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Braverman v. GrangerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Ford Motor Company v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Ickes v. Nexcare Health Systems, L.L.C.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API