Legal Opinion

Blados v. Blados

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 25, 1964PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for the death of her decedent, *393alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence, the court directed a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff has appealed from the judgment, assigning error in the denial of her motion to set aside the verdict and in a ruling on evidence.

In reviewing the action of the court in denying the motion to set aside the verdict, we consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Bambus v. Bridgeport Gas Co., 148 Conn. 167, 168, 169…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Pierce v. AlbaneseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  2. Ardoline v. KeeganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  3. State v. FoordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  4. Hennessey v. HennesseySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  5. Palmieri v. MacEroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  2. Sestito v. City of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  3. Sargent v. RossSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  4. Boehm v. KishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  5. State v. VennardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API