Legal Opinion

In RE: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, And Products Liability Litigation

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 27, 2023No. 1:23-cv-00818Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION IN RE: HAIR RELAXER MARKETING SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS MDL No. 3060 LIABILITY LITIGATION Master Docket No. 23-cv-00818 Judge Mary M. Rowland MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ joint motion to compel production of foreign materials related to hair relaxer products sold outside the United States and materials held by the foreign parent of L’Oreal USA. For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiffs’ motion is granted in part. [315]. I. Background Plaintiffs sued Defendants for the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cheryl A. Gile v. United Airlines, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  2. Kodish v. Oakbrook Terrace Fire Protection DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
  3. Miller UK Ltd. v. Caterpillar, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
  4. Dexia Credit Local v. RoganDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
  5. Wiginton v. CB Richard Ellis, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API