Legal Opinion

Danks v. Holland

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1976No. Civ. 9231PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOGEL, Justice.

The principal issues before us on this appeal relate to the dismissal of a third-party complaint by the trial court, the propriety of an order of the trial court denying an order to compel discovery, whether a judgment entered without prejudice is appeala-ble, and whether the appeal is frivolous. We hold in favor of appealability and against frivolity, and affirm the judgment.

Keith D. Danks, the plaintiff, is the principal owner and chief executive officer of two corporations, Red River Transfer & Storage, Inc., and Hanson-Maves & Compa ny, the business and records of which are…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Wallace & Tiernan Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Hyde v. HydeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Allegheny Airlines, Inc., Third-Party v. Lee Lemay, as Administrator of Estate of Robert W. Carey, Deceased, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
  4. Schriock v. SchriockNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Burdick v. MannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Jablonsky v. KlemmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Applegren v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Albers v. NoDak Racing Club, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Diegel v. City of West FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Hilzendager v. SkwarokNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API