Legal Opinion

Hyde v. Hyde

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1959No. File 9721PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment entered on the verdict of the jury in an action for recovery of damages for breach of contract.

The Frank Hyde Jewelry Company owned and operated a jewelry store in Sioux Falls. Its Capital stock and that of the Frank Hyde Realty Company were owned by plaintiff Frank Hyde, his son Hadleigh, and daughter Esther. In January 1950, Hadleigh Hyde went to California where his sister lived and his father was vacationing for the purpose of negotiating for the purchase of their shares of stock. The brother and sister entered into a contract identified in the record…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Alexander v. AngelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. City Nat. Bank of Huron, SD v. FullerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  3. Davies v. TomsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  4. In Re Daly's EstateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Kindley v. WilliamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of HobelsbergerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Ducheneaux v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Haggar v. OlfertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Olesen v. SnyderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Pearson v. AdamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API