Legal Opinion
STATE BY GOMEZ-BETHKE v. Eastern Air Lines
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 21, 1984No. C4-83-1750PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
Relator appeals from an order refusing to reconsider the dismissal of a marital status discrimination action. The hearing examiner dismissed the action holding that respondent was substantially prejudiced by relator’s failure to provide prompt notice of the marital discrimination charge. Relator claims the hearing examiner’s finding of substantial prejudice was not supported by the record. Regardless of whether the finding of substantial prejudice is upheld, relator claims dismissal was inappropriate. We affirm.
FACTS
Gail Fisher was employed by Eastern Air Lines as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Danz v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. State Ex Rel. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Khalifa v. Russell Dieter Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Jones v. Consolidated Freightways Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Carlson v. Independent School District No. 283Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Fedie v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Fisher v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987