Legal Opinion
BRUTOSKY v. STINNER, D.C.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 3, 2023No. 2:20-cv-13516Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY JUSTIN BRUTOSKY, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 20-13516 (SDW)(JRA) v. OPINION October 3, 2023 DR. FREDERICK STINNER, D.C., et al., Defendants. WIGENTON, District Judge. Before this Court are Defendant Doctor Frederick Stinner’s (“Stinner”) Motions to Exclude Expert Testimony (D.E. 41, 42) and Plaintiffs Justin Brutosky (“Justin”) and Suzana Brutosky’s (“Suzana,” and together with Justin, “Plaintiffs”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (D.E. 51) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 56.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.