Legal Opinion

Brandes v. Pettibone Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1974PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert P. Kennedy, J.

Almost identical actions were brought by plaintiffs to recover for injuries sustained by the infant, an employee of Spancrete Corporation, allegedly as the result of a defective ¡crane being used by Spancrete. The two actions were consolidated for trial by order dated October 3, 1974.

Spancrete, on November 2,1970, entered into what is variously described by plaintiffs as a lease and sale-lease agreement to obtain the crane from defendant Pettibone. This agreement was approved ¡by Pettibone on December 1, 1970. On the same date Pettibone executed a “ Without Recourse Assignment ” to defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Merkel, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Geraci v. FabboziNew York Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. John G. Lambros Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
  2. Marron v. H. O. Penn MacHinery Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1981
  3. Wheatle v. Citibank, North AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API