Nicholas v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*42OPINION
By the Court,
Leavitt, L:
These two cases have been consolidated on appeal. NRAP 3(b). Both appellants are former members of the Nevada Legislature who claim that they are entitled to certain retirement benefits pursuant to Assembly Bill 820 (hereinafter “A.B. 820”) passed by the 1989 session of the Nevada Legislature, which modified provisions of the Legislators’ Retirement Law stated in NRS chapter 218. See 1989 Nev. Stat., ch. 481. A.B. 820 quadrupled the amount of benefits a retired legislator may receive.
Former Governor Miller vetoed A.B. 820, but his veto was overridden the same…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Retirement Board v. McGovernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Singer v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- State Industrial Insurance System v. United Exposition Services Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1993
- Campbell v. Judges' Retirement BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
- Police Pension & Relief Board v. McPhailSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pressler v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 2002
- Justus v. StateColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Nicholas v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2000