Songstad v. Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.
Plaintiffs Songstad, and others having an interest in certain property, appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of the defendant, Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (called Metro).
The action sought to recover damages for alleged injury to plaintiffs’ real property, caused during and after the installation by defendant of the Eastside Interceptor Line, a large sewage disposal line on the east side of Lake Washington. Four theories of liability were asserted in support of plaintiffs’ claim, namely, negligence, trespass, inverse condemnation, and breach of covenant.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. TatumWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- Wong Kee Jun v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Colella v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Boitano v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Olson v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bradley v. American Smelting and Refining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
- Lambier v. City of KennewickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- Seal v. Naches-Selah Irrigation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
- Pande Cameron & Co. of Seattle, Inc. v. Central Puget Sound Regional Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2009