Legal Opinion

Davis v. Brigano

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 7, 2002No. 00-3758PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Petitioner Nathaniel Davis appeals the district court’s denial of his habeas corpus petition as time-barred by the one-year statute of limitations period set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(A). We AFFIRM.

I. BACKGROUND

Petitioner is an inmate in state custody on a conviction of one count of aggravated robbery and an accompanying firearm specification. Petitioner filed the habeas action which is the subject of this appeal on November 29,1999 seeking to challenge these convictions. Under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1), as amended by the Anti-terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”),…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. D'Juan Bronaugh v. State of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  2. Donald Harris v. Clarice StovallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Lewis J. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  4. Frederick White v. James Schotten, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  5. Bagley v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Banks v. OhioDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API