Legal Opinion
Banks v. Ohio
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided October 31, 2002No. C2-02-909PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SARGUS, United States Magistrate Judge.
This 28 U.S.C. § 2254 action is before the Court to consider objections filed by petitioner, Marshall L. Banks, Sr., to a Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge on September 18, 2002. The Magistrate Judge has recommended that this action be dismissed because it was not timely filed under the applicable statute of limitations, 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). The Court has considered the objections de novo and, for the following reasons, will overrule the objections and adopt the Report and Recommendation.
As noted in the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Artuz v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- D'Juan Bronaugh v. State of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Dennis Isham v. Michael Randle, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Crago v. WainwrightDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021