Legal Opinion

In Re Claims of Hyde

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1925No. 5,680PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

The record herein discloses that on June 6, 1923, the board of county commissioners of Mineral county passed a resolution “that the stenographer expense of the county attorney will not be allowed * * * after this date, unless compelled by law to do so.’-’ Thereafter the county attorney continued to employ a stenographer by the day. The claims filed by the stenographer show services performed in connection with criminal eases investigated and filed, the taking and transcribing of testimony in the district and justice courts and, on certain days, in keeping the county attorney’s office open in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hersey v. NeilsonMontana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. People Ex Rel. Gardenier v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. County of Yolo v. JoyceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Poe v. Sheridan CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Independent Publishing Co. v. County of Lewis & ClarkeMontana Supreme Court · 1904

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Petroleum CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Johnson v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Zderick v. Silver Bow CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Brannin v. Sweet Grass CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API