Legal Opinion
Schultz v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided February 27, 1992No. 90-177CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
YOCK, Judge.
This contract action is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. The plaintiffs have brought suit challenging the determination of the Secretary of Agriculture, through his designated representative the Deputy Administrator, State and County Operations (DASCO), that the plaintiffs collectively qualified as only one “person” for payment limitation purposes under the price support and production adjustment programs administered by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) during the 1986 crop year. For the reasons stated herein, after…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- American Hospital Association v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary, H.H.S.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Alabama Hospital Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Knaub v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Raines v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Farms v. EspyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Val Farms v. EspyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Rochman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1992