Legal Opinion

Farms v. Espy

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 30, 1994No. 93-1330PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BARRETT, Senior Circuit Judge.

Appellants, VAL Farms, a Colorado partnership, and its eleven general partners, appeal from an order of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of the Secretary of Agriculture (Secretary). A brief summary of the relevant facts follows.

Congress has authorized the Secretary to implement and administer various programs regulating the production of basic agricultural commodities. See 7 U.S.C. §§ 1441, 1442, 1444, and 1445. One such program was the 1986 Feed Grains Price Support and Production Adjustment Program administered by the Secretary through the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Joe Aulston and Lola Aulston v. United States of America, and Shell Western E & P, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  2. Thomas Brooks Chartered, a Professional Corporation v. James Burnett, Norman Wiemeyer, and the National Transportation Safety BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  3. Webb v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  4. Schultz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Val Farms v. EspyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API