Legal Opinion

Rezendes v. Flanders

Massachusetts District Court

Decided July 27, 1982No. 305Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

This cause came on to and was heard in the Appellate Division for the Southern District sitting at Orleans upon Report from the District Court Department, Fall River Division and it is found and decided that there was prejudicial error.

It is hereby

ORDERED: That the Clerk of the District Court Department, Fall River Division make the following entry in said dase on the docket of said Court, namely: FINDING FOR PLAINTIFF VACATED; A NEW JUDGMENT IS TO ENTER FOR THE PLAINTIFF IN THE SUM OF $1,000.00, WITH INTEREST FROM THE DATE OF COMMENCEMENT OF THE ACTION.

Daniel H. Rider,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vieira v. BalsamoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  2. Commonwealth v. MajorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  3. Feldman v. Davey Development Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  4. Homen v. CabralMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API