Legal Opinion

Creager v. Bryan

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided October 23, 1922No. 197PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause coming on to be heard on the application of the complainants therein for the issuance of a preliminary injunction pursuant to the prayer of the bill, upon consideration, the court being of opinion that it is without jurisdiction to grant the relief prayed for, which is in effect the issuance of a writ of mandamus (Knapp v. Lake Shore Ry. Co., 197 U. S. 536, 25 Sup. Ct. 538, 49 L. Ed. 870; Rosenbaum v. Bauer, 120 U. S. 450, 7 Sup. Ct. 633, 30 L. Ed. 743), the application for the preliminary relief sought is denied.

Because of the above-stated conclusion, it is deemed unnecessary to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rosenbaum v. BauerSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Knapp v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hurt v. Cotton States Fertilizer Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
  2. Fineran v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1924
  3. Stevenson v. Holstein-Friesian Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  4. John C. Winston Co. v. VaughanDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Herkness v. IrionDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API