Knapp v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OP OHIO. The facts arc stated in the Opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna
Petition for mandamus filed in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio by the Interstate Commerce Commissioners against the Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Company. The railway com-, pany moved to dismiss the petition on the ground that the court had no original jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus. The motion was granted and the writ dismissed. A certificate was duly made showing that a question of jurisdiction was in issue, and recites that the court acted not only on the motion of the railroad but on its own motion in dismissing the petition…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kendall v. United States Ex Rel. StokesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- United States v. SchurzSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
3Cited by38 opinions
- Covington & Cincinnati Bridge Co. v. HagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Marshall v. CrottyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1950
- Stern v. South Chester Tube Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Youngblood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
- United States of America Ex Rel. State of Wisconsin v. First Federal Savings and Loan Association and Federal Home Loan Bank BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1957
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.