Legal Opinion

United States v. Donald Paul Hutson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 8, 1988No. 87-1201PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALDISERT, Senior Circuit Judge:

The major question for decision in this appeal from a jury conviction and sentence for violating the federal extortion law, 18 U.S.C. § 876, is the constitutionality of the statute. Appellant Donald Hutson argues that the statute is overbroad and vague. Because we reject these challenges, we will consider Hutson’s additional contention that the government’s reference during his cross-examination to statements made by him in a magistrate’s pre-trial inquiry regarding eligibility for appointed counsel violated his rights under the fifth and sixth amendments to the…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. United States v. James Gerald BryanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. Sanchez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  3. People v. HickmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  4. United States v. Theron Johnny Maxton, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Kelvin E. WilkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API