Legal Opinion
People v. Hickman
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided November 8, 1999No. 98SA29PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bender
In this case, the People appeal a decision by the Mesa County District Court dismissing charges against Glen Hickman. The People charged Hickman with one count of Retaliation Against a Witness or Victim, in violation of section 18-8-706, 6 C.R.S. (1998). Ruling that the statute was unconstitutionally overbroad and vague, the trial court dismissed the charge. We have jurisdiction to consider this appeal pursuant to section 13-4 — 102(l)(b), 5 C.R.S. (1998), and section 16-12-102(1), 6 C.R.S. (1998). We conclude that the term “act of harassment” in the statute is overbroad, but hold that…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- City of Greenwood Village v. for the Proposed City of CentennialSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- People v. CrossSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- Itin v. UngarSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Colorado Department of Labor & Employment v. EsserSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- People v. ShellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.