Legal Opinion

Dana Corp. v. Limbach

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1991No. 90-730PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We hold that the BTA’s decision on the foreign income deductions was reasonable and lawful and, thus, affirm it. However, we hold that Dana failed to specify error concerning deducting property of financial institutions and insurance companies from its net worth property fraction in its notice of appeal filed with the BTA. Consequently, we reverse this aspect of the BTA’s decision.

I. Foreign Income Deduction

R.C. 5733.04(1) defines “net income” for the franchise tax as:

“* * * [T]he taxpayer’s taxable income before operating loss deduction and special deductions, as required to be reported for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hawthorn Mellody, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Lenart v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Osborne Bros. Welding Supply, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Manfredi Motor Transit Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ellwood Engineered Castings Co. v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. General Mills, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API