Legal Opinion

General Mills, Inc. v. Limbach

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1992No. 90-2154PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The decision of the BTA is affirmed in part and reversed in part.

I

Losses arising from General Mill’s federal tax benefit agreements are apportionable under R.C. 5733.051(H).

R.C. 5733.051 provides in part as follows:

“Net income of a corporation subject to the tax imposed by this chapter shall be allocated and apportioned to this state as follows:

(( * * *

“(B) Net rents and royalties from tangible personal property, to the extent such property is utilized in this state, are allocable to this state if the taxpayer is otherwise subject to the tax provided by this chapter;

U * * *

“(H) Any other net…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Abex Corp. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Dana Corp. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. WCI Steel, Inc. v. TestaOhio Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API