Legal Opinion

Wagner v. Galipo

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1990No. 89-110PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtH. Brown, J.

In this appeal, the Galipos argue that they were entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law because their tenancy by the entireties was executed prior to the recording of the judgment lien held by the Wagners.1 For the reasons which follow, we find that issues of fact exist on whether the tenancy by the entireties resulted from a fraudulent conveyance. Thus we affirm the decision of the court below.

I

The creation of a tenancy by the entireties was governed by former R.C. 5302.17, which stated in pertinent part:

“A husband and wife who are the sole owners of real property as joint tenants…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Basil v. VincelloOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Locafrance United States Corp. v. Interstate Distribution Services, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Central National Bank v. FitzwilliamOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Sease v. John Smith Grain Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Basil v. VincelloOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Carter-Jones Lumber Co. v. DenuneOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. McKinley Federal Savings & Loan v. Pizzuro Enterprises, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. E.J. McKernan Co. v. GregoryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  5. Morris v. Zelch (In Re Regional Diagnostics, LLC.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API