Legal Opinion
Cricket Group, Ltd. v. Highmark, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 29, 2016No. Civil No. JFM-15-3159PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
J. Frederick Motz, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Cricket Group, Limited t/d/b/a PPM Transparency Group (“Cricket”) brings this lawsuit against defendant Highmark, Inc. (“Highmark”), seeking to recover damages from an alleged breach of contract for consulting services. Pending is Highmark’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction.1 (ECF No. 18). The motion is fully briefed, and no oral argument is necessary. See Local Rule 105.6. For the reasons stated below, this court cannot exercise personal jurisdiction over Highmark. Pursuant to 28…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- H&P Advisory Limited, a United Kingdom Private Limited Company v. Randgold Resources Limited, a Jersey Corporation and Barrick Gold Corporation, a Canada CorporationWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
- AMA Systems, LLC v. Vonnic, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2022
- Atlantic Corporation of Wilmington, Inc. v. TBG Tech Co., LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2021
- Hubbard v. Eitan Group North AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2023
- Jenna Ferris v. Kimberly HollisterDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.