Legal Opinion

State v. Gilbertson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 7, 1990No. C7-90-241PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

Because the imposition of a long probationary jail term “may, in effect, constitute a de facto departure from the presumptive sentence established by the Sentencing Guidelines,” State v. Randolph, 316 N.W.2d 508, 510 (Minn.1982), we held in State v. Wilwert, 317 N.W.2d 346, 347 (Minn.1982), that the total amount of probationary jail time a defendant may be required to serve generally cannot exceed two-thirds of the presumptive prison sentence duration under the Sentencing Guidelines.

In the instant case, as the court of appeals correctly noted, the trial court’s corrected…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. RandolphSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. State v. WilwertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. RasinskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  2. State v. RasinskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API