Legal Opinion

Batiste v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided October 12, 2006No. 01-04-00460-CRPublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JANE BLAND, Justice.

The State charged appellant, Joseph Isaac Batiste, with possession of methamphetamine, in an amount greater than one gram but less than four. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.116(c) (Vernon 2003). A jury found him guilty and sentenced him to five years’ imprisonment. On appeal, Batiste contends (1) the evidence is legally insufficient to sustain his conviction; (2) the trial court erred in allowing extraneous offense evidence; and (8) if error was not preserved as to the extraneous offense evidence, then Batiste received ineffective assistance of counsel at…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  4. Rylander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  5. Matson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Saldana v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
  2. Stautzenberger v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
  3. Donald Wayne Warren v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  4. Hubert v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
  5. Jesus Perez Saldana v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API