Legal Opinion

H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. Murphy

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 12, 1939No. 27575PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant in error, herein referred to as plaintiff, for damages alleged to have been sustained as a result of salt water and general oil field pollution of a stream known as Little Deep Fork river.

The basis of plaintiff’s claim is that during the year 1933, said stream overflowed several times whereby salt water and oil were carried over and deposited upon the land where plaintiff had planted and had growing certain crops, corn, oats, cotton, whereby certain of his said crops were destroyed and others injured, and the fertility of the soil was so…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Ardmore v. OrrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Pahlka v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Oklahoma City v. WestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Comar Oil Co. v. HackneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Pine v. DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cities Service Gas Co. v. EggersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. United States v. FixicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  3. H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. JuedemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Carter Oil Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  5. Shell Petroleum Corp. v. HessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API