Legal Opinion
Brakeall v. Bieber
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided August 2, 2019No. 4:16-cv-04057Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION WINSTON GREY BRAKEALL, 4:16-CV-04057-KES Plaintiff, vs. ORDER DENNIS KAEMINGK, ROBERT DOOLEY, DARIN YOUNG, DERRICK BIEBER, TIM MEIROSE, WILLIAM ALLEN, LT. R. BROWN, MAJOR STEVE BAKER, LT. CHAD ROTERT, Defendants. Plaintiff, Winston Grey Brakeall, filed this lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Docket 1. After defendants’ motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity, Brakeall’s claims for failure to protect and failure to properly staff the SDSP remain. Docket 98. There are several motions pending before the court,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Johnson v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Devose v. HerringtonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- George Goff v. Charles Harper, Crispus Nix, Ronald Welder, John HenryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.