Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 24, 1939No. Appeal, 61PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Ri-iodes, J.,

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered as the result of an accident which occurred in the manner hereinafter described. At the close of the trial defendant presented a point for binding instructions which was refused, and the jury rendered a verdict for plaintiff. Defendant’s motion for judgment in its favor n. o. v. was dismissed, and it has appealed, assigning as error the refusal of its point and the overruling of its motion.

Appellant’s contention is that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur has no application in the instant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  2. MacDougall v. Penna. Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Ashby v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Mary Laritza v. Pa. Power Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Martin v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. WhiddonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  2. Markovich v. Jefferson Coal & Coke Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Campbell v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. James v. United Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Brown v. Krakowski, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API