Campbell v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

Per Curiam,

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court from which these appeals come: 139 Pa. Superior Ct. 553, 12 A. 2d 816.

Appellant complains that its motions for binding instructions and judgment n. o. v. were refused; the charge is not complained of. In the argument in this Court appellant contends that the Superior Court “applied the test of extraordinary care, required of companies maintaining wires carrying a dangerous current, to a telegraph company whose wires do not carry such current and to whom the logic of the rule relating to carriers of dangerous currents is…