Harlan v. Gladding, McBean & Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The nature of the action is shown by the following allegation of the complaint:.“On January 6, 1904, . . . defendant herein, Jacob Kunzler, for a valuable consideration, duly assigned, by means of a written assignment and order to plaintiff herein, the claim of said defendant Jacob Kunzler against said defendant Gladding, McBean and Company (a corporation), for two hundred and twenty dollars of the sum to be thereafter paid by said defendant Gladding, McBean and Company to said defendant Jacob Kunzler for a certain lot of tule hay on said January 6, 1904, in course of shipment by said…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brumagim v. TillinghastCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Lonergan v. BufordSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Pullen v. Placer Country BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Jolley v. FoltzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Harrison v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re TrombleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Guggenhime & Co. v. LamantiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Baumgarten v. California Pacific Title & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Le Breton v. Stanley Contracting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Holbrook v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.