Legal Opinion

Furr v. Carmichael

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 2, 1986No. 8521DC991PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

I. Plaintiffs’ Appeal

Plaintiffs first argue that the trial court erred in entering the 17 September 1984 Order granting defendants’ partial summary judgment on the issue of fraud and dismissing plaintiffs’ claim for fraud. Plaintiffs contend, and we agree, that the issues before the court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment were the same issues that were before the court on plaintiffs’ motion heard by Judge Alexander and that his finding that there were triable issues of material fact precluded entry of partial summary judgment for defendants on their later motion.

The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Summey v. CauthenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Carr v. Great Lakes Carbon Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Department of Transportation v. M.M. Fowler, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  4. American Travel Corp. v. Central Carolina Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Koonce v. MayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cail v. CerwinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  2. Litvak v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  3. Sharpe v. SharpeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Floto v. Pied Piper Resort, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  5. County of Catawba v. Frye Reg'l Med. Ctr., Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API