Legal Opinion

Lindler v. Kimball

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 28, 1952No. 15333PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

EARL P. HALL, Chief Justice.

Appellee's motion to dismiss appellant’s appeal for want of jurisdiction is founded upon premises that appellant did not present to the trial court his amended motion for new trial in accordance with the provisions of our Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

*934Judgment was rendered by the trial court on July 20, 1951, in favor of appellee. Appellant filed his original motion for new trial on July 27, 1951, and filed his amended motion for new trial on August 16, 1951. The trial court entered the following order: "On the 14th day of September, 1951, the Amended Motion for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. MansfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Basham v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Texas Livestock Marketing Ass'n v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  4. Stubblefield v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Bingham v. KimbrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Heights Savings Association v. CordesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API