Legal Opinion

Ellis v. First National Bank

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 24, 1924PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). The defense relied upon in the first paragraph of the answer copied in our statement of facts is that the Ellisville Lumber Company was coerced into selling the lumber for which the drafts sued on were given.

It is claimed that, by intendment at least, this paragraph shows that, by persistent pressure, the Ellisville Lumber Company was compelled to sell the lumber for which the drafts were given, in order to pay its debt to the bank. This did not in any sense constitute duress in law. It is not duress to threaten to do that which a party has a legal right to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cox v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  2. Johnston v. SchnabaumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  3. Vick v. ShinnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  4. Turner v. TapscottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1875
  5. Bowers v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Perkins Oil Company of Delaware v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  2. Arkansas Bond Company v. HartonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  3. Driesbach v. BeckhamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  4. Union Life Insurance Company v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  5. Hamburg Bank v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API