Legal Opinion

United States v. Moffitt, Zwerling & Kemler, P.C.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided February 10, 1995No. Civ. A. 94CV1384PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ELLIS, District Judge.

This detinue and conversion action is in reality yet another chapter in a lengthy criminal forfeiture saga. The saga grows out of the payment of $103,800 of attorneys’ fees to Moffitt, Zwerling & Kemler, P.C. (the “Law Firm”) by a client who obtained the money through drug trafficking. 1 Until now, the government’s forfeiture efforts have relied solely on the federal scheme for criminal forfeiture set forth in 21 U.S.C. § 853. Previous chapters in the saga chronicle these efforts, which have not been entirely successful. Because the Law Firm spent…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. BaileyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2003
  2. United States v. Moffitt, Zwerling & Kemler, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 1997
  4. In Re Phillips, Beckwith & HallDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. O'HaganDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API