United States v. Moffitt, Zwerling & Kemler, P.C.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLIS, District Judge.
This detinue and conversion action is in reality yet another chapter in a lengthy criminal forfeiture saga. The saga grows out of the payment of $103,800 of attorneys’ fees to Moffitt, Zwerling & Kemler, P.C. (the “Law Firm”) by a client who obtained the money through drug trafficking. 1 Until now, the government’s forfeiture efforts have relied solely on the federal scheme for criminal forfeiture set forth in 21 U.S.C. § 853. Previous chapters in the saga chronicle these efforts, which have not been entirely successful. Because the Law Firm spent…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. BaileyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2003
- United States v. Moffitt, Zwerling & Kemler, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 1997
- In Re Phillips, Beckwith & HallDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. O'HaganDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.